|
Last Update:
World View
Just an Update
It’s been a few weeks since I updated this page, so I perused the news. It seems militants blew themselves up and took a few dozen people with them, enemies of America and small country dictators are making nice, nice in an attempt to stick to the US, but the falling price of oil might be putting a crimp in their plans. The dictators in a few countries in Africa are still dictating and stealing and killing and genocide is unabated.
All’s right with the world.
Oil 90 Miles From Miami
If the U.S. did all the right things to help the environment, it would have a negligible impact on the global environment. That’s a fact. Why, because of all that is going on in all the rest of the world. The U.S. is not the center of the earth and we are not the answer to the problem although with all the ads on TV and the green this and that appearing on store shelves you would think so.
So, while the U.S. Congress and Executive branch bans oil exploration in Alaska, and offshore around the U.S., Brazil, Venezuela, Russia, other countries around the world and even Cuba are going full speed ahead.
While Americans whine about the price of oil, the rest of the world is thinking, “what a bunch of losers.”
Don’t get me wrong; I am all for protecting the environment, our beaches and Alaska, but if we can’t cut our oil consumption to existing levels of domestic production what is going to happen? The answer from Congress cannot be simply No Drilling. We alone cannot save the world environment and while we try we are slipping further down the list of the worlds economic powers.
Don’t tell me the environment is more important than the economy, it sounds good but it is not reality (I wish it was). Congress passes laws to protect us and in the process further screws up our economy and our future and protects us from what?
If Fidel lives long enough he will see Americans begging to buy Cuban oil, just as we do from Hugo Chavez (have you visited a Citgo station recently?)
Remember your Congressman when you have to switch to the new fluorescent light bulbs and drop one then have to leave the house for ten minutes while the mercury disperses (read the label).
June 13, 2008
Lessons Not Learned
As John McCain recently said, only a fool or fraud talks tough or romantically about war.
Yet, there seems to be constant war around the world. We are afraid of war and rightly so of course, but that fear may actually lead us not away from but toward conflicts. In the last century, much of the world ignored the growing militarism of Japan, the growing power of Hitler and his message, the fascists in Italy and even the horror of post revolution Russia. Is it because we cannot comprehend such evil, or that our fear of war helps us to simply look the other way and hope the political rhetoric is just that, rhetoric. But of course it often is not only rhetoric, but rather setting the stage for a single person to acquire power on the back of some scapegoat and isn’t’ it plain old scary that millions of human beings can so easily be cajoled to follow this path, over and over throughout the centuries?
Is today any different? Are we guilty of not taking the rhetoric from the Middle East governments or Muslim leaders seriously? Is it just too hard to accept that the outspoken call for the destruction of non-Muslims, or America or of Israel is real? Who could have conceived the possibility of September 11, 2001 any more than December 7, 1941?
The Middle East may seem far away to many of us, but the rhetoric of hate is in our backyard and throughout Europe, often under the guise of religion.
As a recent article in the Wall Street Journal asked, have we learned the lessons of the last century? I fear not. We seem incapable of seeing what is before our eyes.
June 7, 2008
It Is Not 1945
Americans need to give up the idea that they are living in the United States alone and rather keep a global outlook. Today’s Wall Street Journal that illustrates this view in two ways. One is not all that new, but nevertheless telling. Belgium based InBev is thinking of a hostile takeover of Anheuser-Busch, the icon of American beer. At the same time the United Steelworkers union is in the final stages of a merger with the United Kingdoms biggest union, why, to better deal with international corporations and globalization. In the case of the beer giants one of the reasons is to put them in a better position to market in China. What’s next a Japanese company buying the New York Yankees?
We buy our gas from a company owned by Venezuela and one based in Russia, CITGO and Lukoil ;we buy virtually all of our clothes from Asian countries.
We Americans need to get over the idea that we are the center of the earth, but rather only part of it and a less important part every day. We don’t have the best health care system, or the best education system, we no longer graduate the best and brightest engineers and scientists, we are 18th in ranking in IQ, we don’t live the longest or have the lowest infant mortality rate, our portion of the world economy is shrinking each year, we are in debt to the world up to our eyeballs and our people find it easier every year to seek answers not in their own efforts, but from government.
As we approach Memorial Day even the way we view our military has changed. Certainly we should honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice, and we must take care of our wounded and disabled, but…just because one is in the military does not entitled him or her to other special privileges. Serving in the military of the United States is both an obligation and an honor with emphasis on obligation. Sure we no longer have a draft, but that does not change the fact that serving ones country especially a democracy is not something to be rewarded, but appreciated for doing ones duty and a good job.
In short, we need to get over ourselves and get back to work on the basics, we need to take personal responsibility and to better understand what a globalized world means to the future of the United States of America in the decades ahead. We need to be part of that world and a leader because other people respect us and our accomplishments not because we rest on our laurels from 1945 (or carry a big stick).
Let's get to work!
Peace
May 24, 2008
World News to Start Your Week
Let’s check the world news this morning and raise our spirits for the coming week…or not.
In Johannesburg anti-immigrant rioters are beating, shooting, stabbing and burning alive immigrants from other African countries, many legally in South Africa, so much for setting an example in a country where many of its leaders fled to other African countries during apartheid. Hey, why don’t they just build a fence around South Africa?
In Kuwait 24 out of 50 seats in their parliament were won by Islamists, meaning that fundamentalists are gaining a wider foothold there. And of special interest out of a country of some 2.6 million only 360,000 people are eligible to vote. Ah, democracy in action in the Middle East. Say, Barack here is a real opportunity for change; on the other hand perhaps we should mind our own business for a change, that is until those Islamists decide they want Americans out of their country. That name sounds familiar, didn’t we fight a war their…for whose benefit?
Somalia pirates (what is this the 18th century) hijacked a Jordanian ship carrying aid to Mogadishu. With more than 36 such attacks so far this year, Somalia officials blame Western companies because they pay ransoms and thus encourage such attacks. Ah, convoluted thinking in the developing world. Never fear the US and France are trying to get permission from the UN to track down and arrest these guys. “To the shores of Tripoli…”
A suicide bomber in Pakistan killed 11, but there is progress, in Afghanistan a suicide bomber only killed 4 civilians. Don’t you wonder who sets the odds here, 11-1, 4-1, go figure? Will we ever run out of suicide bombers at this rate?
It must be a slow news day because we are also told that in South Korea a wife who cheated on her husband is challenging a male centric adultery law and in the process putting the affair on the front pages there. Now there is news you don’t want to miss.
May 19, 2008
The War You Don't Know
Nearly 4,000 people killed in the last few years, including innocent bystanders, police, soldiers plus thousands more wounded. Beheading, threats, warnings and intimidation, all seemingly beyond the control of the government that is riddled with corruption. In one particularly disturbing incident, a police commander was beheaded and his head stuck in the fence outside police headquarters with a note attached to his head with an ice pick. Isn’t it time we pulled out of this mess?
Eh, not exactly, because we are talking about Mexico and the killings by drug gangs occurred since 2006, not over five years, as is the case in Iraq. Why don’t we hear about this in the newspapers? It sure sounds as tragic as Iraq and equally as threatening to America as the drugs coming through Mexico are heading right for us. Oh yes, the guns used by these gangs, they are purchased at Texas gun shows, except the big stuff like grenade launchers, bazooka and missiles.
March 23, 2008

Hey Joe, what if we put the bank logo about here?
The world must be having a good laugh. It reads about our unions and others complaining about globalization, it hears members of Congress talking protectionism, we tout our great standard of living, we live high on the hog, we accumulate an unbelievable debt and now we seek to return taxes to people who can’t afford their oil bill. We advertising how nice it is to accept oil from a dictator trying to turn South America in Cuba and now some of our largest financial institutions are out there with hat in hand asking Prince Abu Bada Bing to bail them out.
Hey Citi why don’t you ask the UAW or CALPERS if they want to invest some of their pension funds just to keep things from going global?
I have a country for sale…cheap
Here is a nice kettle of fish, America is so strong in the financial markets we need Abu Dhabi (I thought that was some rapper group), China (the once country of two billion surfs) and Singapore to bail out some of the biggest names on Wall Street. J.P. Morgan and friends are probably turning over in their graves. It is a good thing that those homes in Newport, RI are in a historic trust or they too would be on the block in the sub-prime debacle.
That plump dictator wannabe in Venezuela owns Citgo, Russia has the controlling interest in Lukoil (now lining the toll roads of New Jersey) and China wanted to buy Unocal. Next thing you know we will all be eating chow mien and borsht while waiting in the line for gasoline. Except women of course, they won’t be allowed to fill up a car at all because those Abu Dhabi folk don’t let women drive and if you control the oil you apparently control America as well.
This is our own entire greedy fault. World governments have billions and trillions of dollars (or maybe some other currency these days) to burn and America is having a fire sale. Is it supposed to be that way?
The following is finding it’s way around the internet.
Joe Smith started the day early having set his alarm clock (MADE IN JAPAN) for 6 am. While his coffeepot (MADE IN CHINA) was perking, he shaved with his electric razor (MADE IN HONG KONG). He put on a dress shirt (MADE IN SRI LANKA), designer jeans (MADE IN SINGAPORE) and tennis shoes (MADE IN KOREA) After cooking his breakfast in his new electric skillet( MADE IN INDIA) he sat down with his calculator (MADE in MEXICO ) to see how much he could spend today. After setting his watch (MADE IN TAIWAN) to the radio (MADE IN INDIA) he got in his car (MADE IN GERMANY) filled it with GAS from Saudi Arabia and continued his search for a good paying AMERICAN JOB. At the end of yet another discouraging and fruitless day checking his Computer (Made In Malaysia ), Joe decided to relax for a while. He put on his sandals (MADE IN BRAZIL) poured himself a glass of wine (MADE IN FRANCE) and turned on his TV ( MADE IN INDONESIA), and then wondered why he can't find a good paying job in.. AM E R I C A .
I have one question for Joe Smith, how could you afford to buy all that stuff? Bet he shopped at Wal-Mart.
Sounds like sour grapes to me!
November 29, 2007
A Scary Thought
China has a problem with its population moving from the rural areas to the cities with young men making up the bulk of those moving. How does China keep them employed and happy and what are the consequences if it doesn’t? Well one (and clearly the preferable way) is the have a growing economy so there are well paying jobs available. Moreover, one important factor is exports, which means that countries like the US better think twice about tariffs that make it harder for China to keep its population employed. You see back a few years ago, the US Congress in its wisdom imposed high tariffs on sugar thus precipitating a revolution in Cuba which in turn resulted in the Spanish American War.
Oh, the other alternative for China to keep its millions of young men occupied in a 50,000,000-man army. And what if the Hilter of the 21st Century is Chinese?
November 3, 2007
What Matters
It doesn’t matter what you think of President Bush, or Iraq, Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives. Were you for or against an invasion of Iraq, were there WMDs or not? Again, it does not matter.
What does matter is that you have an understanding of the world and world history. It matters that you understand that Muslims in India, are at the lowest end of that society and that their schooling intentionally avoids subjects that will enable them to raise themselves from poverty (at least by western standards) and that they are taught not in English the language of business in India and the world, but in Arabic.
Look at the pages below this article and see the demographics of the Muslim world, the literacy and poverty levels. Understand that Muslims are taught to avoid many of the modern attributes of life and commerce and to take religious teachings literally. Be aware of the abuse and atrocities heaped on the Muslim world over the centuries, including the twentieth century, and the in kind actions by Muslims.
And most of all understand that even with the absence of large armies marching toward one another, the world is at war, perhaps with an enemy far more committed, more intelligent and more resourceful than has ever been seen before. To all this you can add religion, the most powerful motivator of all.
Observe the intensity of violence, the disregard for any human life young or old, man or woman, including ones own, can you comprehend what motivates people to do such things, can you understand the force of religious zeal? You better.
No the issue is not getting out of Iraq, or the Middle East or oil independence. The issue is understanding what is really happening in the world. Do you have any doubts that extremists will use any weapon they can get their hands on, you shouldn’t. Do you think you can apply your rational, logical thinking or even your compassionate religious values to anticipate what they might do, you likely cannot?
Here is the perspective you should understand:
The world should be Muslim and it is your duty to advance that, all non-Muslims are violating the word of God, no religion but your own is to be tolerated, you are uneducated except in your religion, you have lived in poverty for centuries often under dictatorships, your very country was created by western politicians, you are taught about the Crusades and other indignities and you are convinced that the end justifies any means.
Now you know what matters.
Lentils or Cash
Just when you think you know someone they come up and slap you upside the head.
While we agonize over the solutions to the Iraq mess, I read a story in the Wall Street Journal ® about how American soldiers are winning over some Iraq tribes by paying cash for cooperation and providing an economic incentive for these tribes to support Americans or at least not support Al Qaeda. On the surface that seems like a good thing, at least the not support the insurgents part, but on closer examination it seems to say that if the Iraqi’s wanted to take back their country they really could, and that is not happening because…
Another article tells me once again how people are different and how the simplistic American view of the world gets us into trouble big and little. We Americans like to shop in a clean, spacious, well organized store and if we were to walk into a supermarket with rotting vegetables, floors strewn with food from broken packages, crowded aisles and open barrels of lentils, or dry goods in disarray we would likely walk out (except if it were a Wall Mart, K-Mart, Macy’s or Home Depot, of course). Not so in India, they apparently like it that way and so much so that one retailer intentionally makes his stores with narrow crowded aisles, places rotting food next to good food (so people think they are able to pick out the best), and lets the lentil beans spill and stay on the floor. Being a bit claustrophobic, I would likely starve to death in India. Go figure.

History is a Great Teacher, but the Class is Always Truant
“The growing imperialistic impulse in the United States, the nation’s pride in its wealth and military strength, the sense that it had a mission to spread freedom and democracy around the globe, combined with its humanitarian regard for the suffering of those under dictatorial rule, brought about a collision with [fill in the blank] over conditions in [fill in the blank], where rebels had begun an insurrection to free [fill in the blank]."
Where in the world, Iraq, Somalia, Vietnam? Eh, not exactly.
It is 1898, and the United States just annexed the Hawaiian Islands, the start of American expansion beyond its territories (following the purchase of Alaska in 1867).
Interestingly, the above paragraph from “The House” The History of the House of Representatives, by Robert V. Remini is talking about the Spanish American War and the United States exercising its muscle by instigating this conflict. In fact, the rebellion going on in Cuba at that time was brought about in part by high American tariffs that imposed a duty on raw sugar thus contributing to the failing Cuban economy. Can you say free trade?
The U.S. recognized Cuba’s independence, Spain declared war, the U.S. declared war (retroactively) and kaboom. It was all over in a few months, but the U.S. ended up with Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines whereupon the Philippine people expecting independence revolted and off we go. U.S. troops were sent in to quell a rebellion of a people seeking their freedom only a few months after America went to war supposedly to help another group of people in Cuba do the same thing.
Now, when you have a hard time understanding why the U.S. is viewed as it is in the world today, think of this short story long ago and hope that the members of Congress were not truant for all their history classes, assuming of course there were history classes taught at all.
And think about the risks we face everyday based solely on the hubris, greed, arrogance, shortsightedness, self-interest and just plain stupidity of the people making decisions for us.
Let us be clear on one thing, it is not immigration reform, it is Mexican immigration reform.
You do not see Russians, or Poles, or Swedes marching in the streets. You do not see German or Indian flags among crowds in our parks. You do not see any other group of people demanding that the U.S. throw out its laws and legalize 12 million plus illegal immigrants other than Mexicans or other Central and South American groups. You do not see any other large group of people unwilling to play by the rules.
Exactly what is going on here?
Is it the close proximity to the US, is it the demand for workers generated in the US and the willingness of many employers and Americans to look the other way when a crew of Mexicans shows up to put in a new garden, replace a roof or pick a crop? Yes, it is all of those. We get it. So, why isn’t the answer special work permits for individuals who want to and need to do that kind of work. Permits that track these people, expire after a few years, and require the collecting of taxes like all other workers. Yes, it probably does mean that we all pay a bit more for the goods and services now provided by illegal workers.
The last thing the US needs is millions upon millions of more people added to an underclass in the US. There already is a shrinking middle class and adding 12-20 million low-income people without skills or even the ability to speak English to the population helps no one. See the discussion on the GINI index below…and be afraid, be very afraid. Oh no, I am not talking about Mexicans I am referring to what is happening in America among Americans.
I hear demonstrators yell for fair treatment and I am mystified on how that is defined. Fair means you enter the US legally, you have a fair chance to use and improve your skills, you are not discriminated against and you have a fair chance to make a better life and contribute to society. Fair is not sneaking over the border, staying a few years and instantly becoming an American citizen. Fair does not mean that the United States is the social agency for the world (and often kicked in the teeth for trying)
Being an American carries a large responsibility, one admittedly not carried by millions of people who were born an American citizen. That is a big problem in itself. The average American is largely ignorant of American history and the development of the US, the why and how we got where we are today. They accept politics rather than solutions, cheat on taxes and blame the successful for their shortcomings and all this is fanned by politicians. Ye gads, we have enough to worry about, we do not need an influx of people far less aligned with the history and culture of the United States and little interest in being so aligned. It is not about living in America, it is about being an American, speaking English, becoming absorbed in our culture not changing it or retaining ones old culture and enjoying the benefits of a free democracy, which in many ways is its own worst enemy.
Mexico gained its independence from Spain in 1821; it has a 92.2% literacy rate and that is far better than most Middle Eastern countries. Life expectancy is 75.63 years, not much different from the US. So why do Mexicans have to come to the United States, didn’t Mexico have a chance to build a free and fair society?
Here is what the CIS says about Mexico: The site of advanced Amerindian civilizations, Mexico came under Spanish rule for three centuries before achieving independence early in the 19th century. A devaluation of the peso in late 1994 threw Mexico into economic turmoil, triggering the worst recession in over half a century. The nation continues to make an impressive recovery. Ongoing economic and social concerns include low real wages, underemployment for a large segment of the population, inequitable income distribution, and few advancement opportunities for the largely Amerindian population in the impoverished southern states. The elections held in 2000 marked the first time since the 1910 Mexican Revolution that an opposition candidate - Vicente FOX of the National Action Party (PAN) - defeated the party in government, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). He was succeeded in 2006 by another PAN candidate Felipe CALDERON.
To make matters worse, Mexico does not have a two party system something generally assumed as the norm in the US, rather Mexico has many factions such as Convergence for Democracy or CD [Luis MALDONADO Venegas]; Institutional Revolutionary Party or PRI [Beatriz PAREDES]; Labor Party or PT [Alberto ANAYA Gutierrez]; Mexican Green Ecological Party or PVEM [Jorge Emilio GONZALEZ Martinez]; National Action Party (Partido Accion Nacional) or PAN [Manuel ESPINO Barrientos]; New Alliance Party (Partido Nueva Alianza) or PNA [Miguel Angel JIMENEZ Godinez]; Party of the Democratic Revolution (Partido de la Revolucion Democratica) or PRD [Leonel COTA Montano]; Social Democratic and Peasant Alternative Party (Partido Alternativa Socialdemocrata y Campesina) or Alternativa [Alberto BEGNE Guerra]
I am especially enthralled by the use of “revolutionary”, and “revolution” and “peasant.”
Unemployment is lower than the US at 3.2% but there is underemployment of perhaps 25%. 40% of Mexicans live below the poverty line (about the same as the Sudan) which of course explains why they seek work in the US, but isn’t the answer not in the US, but in Mexico?
Mexico has a GINI index of 54.6 this index measures the degree of inequality in the distribution of family income in a country. The lower the number the better. The US is 45 (not especially good say when compared with Ireland at 35.9). The point being that Mexico has an inherent problem in income distribution, the US is not too far behind, and hence it is not a good idea to exacerbate a problem the US needs to deal with.
Finally, what else plagues Mexico, well according to the CIA, Mexico is a source, transit, and destination country for persons trafficked for sexual exploitation and labor; while the vast majority of victims are Central Americans trafficked along Mexico's southern border, other source regions include South America, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia; women and children are trafficked from rural regions to urban centers and tourist areas for sexual exploitation, often through fraudulent offers of employment or through threats of physical violence; the Mexican trafficking problem is often conflated with alien smuggling, and frequently the same criminal networks are involved; pervasive corruption among state and local law enforcement often impedes investigations tier rating: Tier 2 Watch List - Mexico remains on the Tier 2 Watch List for the third consecutive year based on future commitments to undertake additional efforts in prosecution, protection, and prevention of trafficking in persons, and the failure of the government to provide critical law enforcement data.
Mexico is a major drug-producing nation; cultivation of opium poppy in 2005 amounted to 3,300 hectares yielding a potential production of 8 metric tons of pure heroin, or 17 metric tons of "black tar" heroin, the dominant form of Mexican heroin in the western United States; marijuana cultivation decreased 3% to 5,600 hectares in 2005 - just two years after a decade-high cultivation peak in 2003 - and yielded a potential production of 10,100 metric tons; government conducts the largest independent illicit-crop eradication program in the world; continues as the primary transshipment country for US-bound cocaine from South America, with an estimated 90% of annual cocaine movements towards the US stopping in Mexico; major drug syndicates control majority of drug trafficking throughout the country; producer and distributor of ecstasy; significant money-laundering center; major supplier of heroin and largest foreign supplier of marijuana and methamphetamine to the US market.
Did you see all that on any signs?
"Hey, Abdul what to you think of the Americans? Are they going to get out of here?
You betcha Mohammed, they have no stomach for a fight.
But their Congress says that if they give a timeline to leave the traitors in our government will have to get their act together. That’s bad news.
Watch it, it is not our governement! Get a grip Mohammed, that ain’t gonna happen. They give a timeline, we play it cool for a few months, let things quiet down and when they are out of here, Bam, we takeover.
No matter, in any case, time is on our side. You will never see peace protests in the streets of Baghdad.
But then what, Abdul?
Very simple my friend, we do what we want to do and keep the oil flowing, the infidels care about nothing more.
You mean we sell them oil and they fund our noble cause, even Americans are not that stupid.
Mohammed you underestimate the Americans, they are far more stupid than you give them credit for. "
Hey, Joe Kennedy...
do you still think our friends are in Venezuela? Perhaps you should have a talk with the folks at Verizon, they may need some help with their oil bill after they get burned with Chavez’s nationalization of their telecommunications company. CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — President Hugo Chavez told U.S. officials to “Go to hell, gringos!” and called Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice “missy” on his weekly radio and TV show Sunday, lashing out at Washington for what he called unacceptable meddling in Venezuelan affairs.
George, let me introduce you to Mr. Adams
On July, 4, 1821 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State (yes, of the United States of American), declared [the United States would always be] “the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all” nations, but that it must not go “abroad in search of monsters to destroy” by enlisting under banners other “than our own.” Such a policy, he insisted, would inaugurate American’s search for “dominance and power” in the world, and would ultimately result in the loss of our own “freedom and independence.”
I am a great believer in learning from history, but this is scary stuff, right George?
And today (January 28, 2007) in the New York Times Magazine there is an article talking about Hugo Chavez aligning forces from around the world against the United States (as well as a reference that China may well do the same thing some day). There is an old saying about learning from ones mistakes, but politicians only have to worry about their mistakes while in office and when they go merrily on their way, the rest of us have to deal with the consequences. Today, the stakes have never been higher and yet, the only thing we know about a famous Adams is that his picture is on a beer bottle, that’s Sam by the way.
Back off guys, the world has enough to worry about and it doesn’t’ need to deal with Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Actually, when you think about it Americans have enough to worry about as well, not to mention that the same people have caused most of those worries.
Why shouldn’t the world hate America, we have everything, we consume everything and the press is full of what can easily be perceived of as aggression by those at the other end of us defending our freedom, couple all that with blatant arrogance and well, you get the picture. None of our generosity either as a country or by individual Americans will offset that perception.
As they say in the business world, we need a new strategy, perhaps a giant focus group will do, or more “socializing” of our thoughts (my new favorite buzz word). Ah, I have it a meeting, conference call or web cast. I vote for zero basing. Get all American troops back on American soil and start over. Where do we really need to be around the world?
Who wants us and why? Ok, so we probably already know the answer to that one.
I didn’t do anything to people in Iraq, or Iran or Venezuela and you probably didn’t either. If they want to live in a theocracy or dictatorship or under communism, or socialism, be my guest. So we need their oil, they need our cash, big deal. What happended to old fashioned diplomacy, John Q’s dad for example, or Ben. Can you imagine how smart you would have to be to get France to back a rag tag group of revolutionaries without a prayer of defeating one the world powers?
Now if you don’t know what I am talking about, you just proved my point.

Don't Let the Facts Get In the Way of Decisions
Like many people I have a keen interest in Iraq, not that one could easily avoid Iraq with the constant barrage of news, nor should one attempt to avoid it. However, recently I attempted to get a better understanding of the entire Middle East. I found a great deal of information in of all places the CIA World Fact Book, right there on the internet for all to see. It would have been a good idea for President Bush and his advisors to surf the Web before trying to bring democracy to Iraq. You can read what I found below, but let us just say that the people of the Middle East are not the best candidates for a participatory, open government, let alone one that is based on common law.
What you find is a group of countries whose governments are a mix of monarchies, and dictatorships operating under a mix of common law and Islamic law. Countries with a low average age, relatively high unemployment, high poverty levels and low literacy. Countries where women and members of the military are not allowed to vote (or there is no vote for anyone). Even I concluded that is a good recipe for breeding discontent and dare I say it, terrorists. There is little room for debate or discussion and there is no room for dissention when it comes to religion.
And, oh yes, many of these countries are virtually totally dependent on oil for income while a significant portion of their populations are employed in government jobs (ok, so that is not much different from the U.S.).
There is another common characteristic; these countries were previously under foreign control, many by the British – sound 1776 familiar?
Hopefully, the next time we go on a quest to save the world from itself, we will make a visit to our own library.
The Middle East
Afghanistan-Islamic Republic, gained independence from the U.K. in 1919, operates on the basis that no law should be contrary to Islam, 40% unemployment, 53% living in poverty, literacy 36%
Bahrain-Hereditary Monarchy, gained independence from U.K. in 1971, operates under Islamic Law and English Common Law, 15% unemployment, unknown number in poverty, literacy 89.1%
Egypt-Republic election by popular vote, gained independence from U.K. in 1922, 9.5% unemployment, 20% living in poverty, operates under English Common Law, Islamic Law and Napoleonic Law, Religious based parties are banned, literacy 57.7%
Iran-Theocratic Republic, gained independence from U.K, 1961, 11.2% unemployment, 40% living in poverty, most economic activity controlled by the state. Has $40 billion in foreign exchange reserves in the midst of economic hardships, literacy 79.4%
Jordon-Constitutional Monarchy, gained independence from British administration in 1946, 12.5% unemployment (unofficial rate 30%), 30% living in poverty, operates under Islamic law and French codes, literacy 91.3%
Kuwait-Constitutional Hereditary Emirate, political parties are illegal, adult males not in the military can vote as can adult women (as of May 2005), operates under civil law with Islamic law significant in personal matters, 2.2% unemployment, unknown poverty levels, literacy 83.5%
Libya-Military Dictatorship (a state of the masses in theory), gained independence from UN trusteeship 1951, operates under Italian civil law and Islamic law, no political parties, 30% unemployment, unknown number living in poverty, literacy 82.6%
Lebanon-Republic, gained independence from League of Nations mandate under French administration 1943, males age 21 can vote, women 21 can vote if they have an elementary education, operates under mixture of Ottoman law, canon law, Napoleonic code and civil law, 18% unemployment, 28% living in poverty, literacy 87.4%
Oman-Monarchy, gained independence by expelling Portuguese in 1650, all Omanis can vote except members of the military and security forces, operates under English common law and Islamic law, only appeal is to the monarch, 15% unemployment, unknown number living under poverty, literacy 75.8%
Qatar-Traditional Emirate, gained independence from the U.K. in 1971, operates under discretionary system of law controlled by the Amir, some civil codes being implemented; Islamic law dominates family and personal matters, 18 year olds can vote, but no legislative elections have been held since 1970, 2.7% unemployment rate, unknown number living in poverty, literacy 89%
Saudi Arabia-Monarchy, unification of the kingdom in 1932, operates under Shari” a (Islamic) law, males 21 and older can vote for municipal councils, no political parties, 13% unemployment (Saudi males only) some local estimates as high as 25%, unknown number living in poverty, literacy 78.8%
Syria-Republic under an authoritarian military-dominated regime, gained independence from League of Nations mandate under French administration 1946, operates under combination of French and Ottoman civil law, religious law is used in family court system, 12.3% unemployment, 20% living in poverty, literacy 76.9%
United Arab Emirates-Federation with specific powers and other powers reserved to member emirates, gained independence from U.K. in 1971, no voting, secular courts, except Islamic courts to review family and religious disputes, 2.4% unemployment, unknown number living in poverty, literacy 77.9%
United States of America-Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic traditions, gained independence from Great Britain (U.K.) in 1776, operates under federal court system based on English common law, each state has its own system based on English common law (except Louisiana). 4.5% unemployment, 12% living in poverty, literacy 99%
 
and 

and 
The War
Before you continue, keep in mind I am not saying what is right or wrong, I am not making judgments (ok, so I do make a few). The point is that before we do come to conclusions or take action or bet the farm on a certain outcome, we should understand what we are dealing with. That is not so hard is it, well yeah apparently it is.
And, before you get too excited should you read this mister Democrat or otherwise anti Bush, regardless of whom is right or wrong, this is not the time to take public shots that will cause undeterminable harm to America, so shutuppa your mouth in public.
I have been reading, and thinking about Iraqi, a lot. Perhaps you have as well. Currently the debate is whether or not the war in Iraqi is making the war on terror better or worse or whether the presence of the U.S. in Iraqi is helping the terrorists gain new recruits. It seems to me that none of these questions would be relevant if we never were in Iraqi in the first place. How about that for a deep thought? Here is the truth as I see it. We never should have gone to war in Iraqi; it had little if anything to do with the war on terror. Rather, we were led into Iraqi by an arrogant group of gunslingers who thought they knew all the answers and at least in some small part were out to settle the score with old Sadam. These people see things very simply as black or white and right or wrong and from a view of United States world dominance and power. In addition, I suspect they spent very little time studying history, ancient history and probably ignored advice that pointed out the unique Muslim mindset. The world is changing guys and if we want to be a world player in the years ahead we had better start understanding how important H&M is and to do that we need to understand people, perspectives, and history.
H&M = Hearts and Minds and if we continue ignoring the importance of both in the rest of the world, well, the U.S. is not going to be the 800 lb gorilla for much longer.
Oh, by the way I am quite conservative in nature and the first person I ever voted for and would again was Barry Goldwater. To make matters worse I read the Wall Street Journal, every day. Let’s move on.
I am not saying get the heck out of Iraqi and do it now. We should never have gotten into Iraqi, but we did so now the most important thing is HOW we get out (and everyone in the Muslim world is watching, along with our buddies in North Korea and don't forget it). How the U.S. disengages from this mess is one of the most important acts that America will undertake for the next hundred years. If you think I am being overdramatic, think again, read the papers, and listen to what you hear and see on television, I mean really listen especially to the non-western world all over the globe and then think how exposed the U.S. could be if only a few events fall into place. Most important, try hard to think.
Consider this; Sadam Hussein was a tyrant who murdered many people, lived in grandeur while most of his country lived as if it was 1100 and did who knows what to make the lives of the majority of Iraqi people miserable, at least by our standards. So it would stand to reason (American reason) that if someone comes in and gets rid of Sadam and in the process kills his sons who were responsible for much of the misery, they would be heroes. Recently a poll in Iraqi showed that 60% of the people want the U.S. out of their country and a majority of Iraqi’s approve of the attacks on Americans in their country. These views are held at a time of virtual civil war, suicide attacks, death squads, deprivation and worse. Does that compute to the American mind, hey we are the good guys remember.
The terrorists would not be able to survive if they did not receive the aid and comfort, support, or at least acquiescence of the population and you are not going to change that with bullets.
What can motivate a person; in fact, many people, to blow themselves up along with scores of innocent people? What can motivate one sect of the same religion to kill people of another sect simply because of who they are? Who can imagine living in a country where the religious leaders run the government? Who can comprehend that the penalty for renouncing ones religion for another is death (see next paragraph)? I know one thing for sure the average American, let alone a politician, and the average westerner is incapable of understanding the motivation or mindset of the average Middle East Muslim.
Can you relate?
“Beheading has particular prominence in Saudi Arabia. In 2003 alone, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia beheaded more than fifty people. This number included both Muslim and non-Muslim workers. Over the past two decades, the Saudis have decapitated at least 1,100 for alleged crimes ranging from drug running to witchcraft and apostasy” source: http://www.meforum.org/article/713 are you reading this carefully, it says “witchcraft and apostasy” and in case you don’t know what that is, it means “the renunciation of a religious or political belief or allegiance.” In other words if you were a Presbyterian and you are now Catholic, in the Saudi Arabia you would have no place to put your hat.
Can you relate?
Until 1962, slavery was legal and practiced. Got that Jesse and Al? A fatwa, an Islamic law, stated that the Koran [the holy book of Islam] approved slavery. After 1962, the former slaves simply became "domestic servants" of the wealthy for whom they already worked.
A Saudi royal great-granddaughter was killed with her lover for the crime of adultery (as I recall not because she was married, but because she was not).
http://www.the-spark.net/csart134.html
So if we cannot comprehend the way some people think or why, how can we win a war for H&M? We cannot! Got that George, Dick, Donny?
What war is that you say? Exactly, what war are we trying to win? Politicians call it the war on terror and put it in terms that Americans understand a threat to our way of life, destruction of property and lives, kind of World War II stuff. Big mistake. To understand what the world is facing you must have a good understanding of history and of Islam and Americans have neither. The simple idea that attacking any enemy with a mighty armed force, regardless of the dedication of the fighting men and women or the power they posses will carry the day is absurd and yet it appears that many politicians and westerners in general believe that to be the case in Iraqi. Another big mistake.
Besides not understanding the “war”, we do not seem to understand that any human being given the right circumstances, the right motivation and the right stimulation in the form of a charismatic leader will do anything. Add to that mix a general disenfranchisement and the potent force of religion and you have a deadly combination. All of that is present in the Middle East and in other parts of what we call the Muslim world. Moreover, there are reasons for it, understanding that is one key to a more stable world.
History may be a dead subject in our schools, but it is not dead in the memory of people looking for a cause and scapegoat and does not go unnoticed by those seeking to motivate them. What we see in the world today is only the most recent example.
Extreme violence in the Middle East has a long history and people living in the Middle East have a long memory.
From http://www.medievalcrusades.com/kingsofjerusalem.htm
“On July 13-14, (1099) the main attack began. Godfrey of Bouillon gained the north wall, and with his brother, Eustace, commanded the troops from there. The Arabs within, seeing their defenses broken, fled to the Temple Dome of the Rock. They surrendered to Tancred. Iftikhar realized by midday that the City was lost. He took refuge in the Tower of David. Iftikhar surrendered to Raymond there, and Raymond allowed him safe passage from the City. They were the only Moslems allowed to leave and live. No Jews were spared either. The Crusaders, in their fury, slaughtered all. Moslems in the Dome, or Jews in their Synagogue, all were killed without regard. When no one but the Crusaders were left alive, they proceeded to the Holy Sepulcher to give thanks.”
The Muslim religion was founded in about 622, which is more than 400 years before the first crusade, if you discount the so-called Children’s Crusade.
From http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3577287
“The army pushed through the Byzantine and Persian Empires, and by 649 AD Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Persia, Tripolitania and Cyprus had all fallen to Islam. The army was successful for a number of reasons. For a start, it was large. Most of its members were enthusiastic new converts, quite young, and were keen to do their way by God. Previously separate tribes had tried attacks and had failed, but with the tribes united under one leader they were a much stronger force.”
Does any of this sound familiar or relate to the Middle East today? You bet your sweet petro dollars it does. Now think colonialism, think 1948, think the Shah of Iran, THINK and then hope that someone with actual influence over this is thinking smarter and harder than the rest of us.

Where’s My Jar of Kimchee?
So now North Korea is planning to test an A bomb and why shouldn’t it, surely I jest, but after all who doesn’t have the right to their own “bomb?". If you’re going to be a dictator and run a government to feed your own ego with delusions of grandeur, of course you need the “bomb.” Look at it this way while you may be nearly insane, you do run a country don’t you and that’s no small feat. How many fully sane normal people get to run a country? After all, nearly half of the really sane Americans can’t even find the time to vote, let alone run anything. Kim Jong Il, you deserve some credit you sly old devil, while you maintain one of the worlds largest standing army’s to help you stay in power, the world continues to bail you out so you are able to divert resources from your people to building the “bomb.” What a deal. We so-called humanitarians in the world may have compassion, but we are not too smart, at least not as smart as you are. You probably have figured this out already, but just in case you haven’t, the sight of starving children and the prospects of millions of people facing starvation kind of gets to us, so what do we do, we send you tons of food and aid which you in turn direct to best meet your needs. At least give us some credit for helping you stay in power, hey that should be worth a jar or two of Kimchee (in case you want the recipe here it is: http://www.recipelink.com/mf/3/7359
Oops
Sad to say, but humanitarian aid in the wrong hands builds the “bomb” so the lesson for all those who cringe at the sight of starving children is………..you figure it out. Ok, I will. The simple truth is that in order to change North Korea the situation needs to be so bad that even its army can no longer stand what is happening and it and the citizens force a change in the government. In other words, if you keep giving liquor to an alcoholic, they will keep drinking and being an alcoholic. Consider the following facts and draw your own conclusions.
From the CIA Fact Book:
After decades of economic mismanagement and resource misallocation, the DPRK since the mid-1990s has relied heavily on international aid to feed its population while continuing to expend resources to maintain an army of 1 million. North Korea's long-range missile development, as well as its nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs and massive conventional armed forces, are of major concern to the international community.
Despite an increased harvest in 2005 because of more stable weather conditions, fertilizer assistance from South Korea, and an extraordinary mobilization of the population to help with agricultural production, the nation has suffered its 11th year of food shortages because of on-going systemic problems, including a lack of arable land, collective farming practices, and chronic shortages of tractors and fuel. Massive international food aid deliveries have allowed the people of North Korea to escape mass starvation since famine threatened in 1995, but the population continues to suffer from prolonged malnutrition and poor living conditions. Large-scale military spending eats up resources needed for investment and civilian consumption.
For years, from the 1970s into the 2000s, citizens of the Democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea (DPRK), many of them diplomatic employees of the government, were apprehended abroad while trafficking in narcotics, including two in Turkey in December 2004; police investigations in Taiwan and Japan in recent years have linked North Korea to large illicit shipments of heroin and methamphetamine, including an attempt by the North Korean merchant ship Pong Su to deliver 150 kg of heroin to Australia in April 2003.
From: Report for Congress
U.S. Assistance to North Korea
Updated March 17, 2003
Mark E. Manyin
Analyst in Asian Affairs
Ryun Jun
Research Associate
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Since 1995, the U.S. has provided over $1 billion in foreign assistance to the
Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea (DPRK, also known as North Korea), about 60% of which has taken the form of food aid, and about 40% in the form of energy assistance channeled through the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO). Additionally, there has been discussion of offering North Korea broader economic development assistance in exchange for Pyongyang verifiably dismantling its nuclear program and cooperating on other security-related issues. U.S. aid to North Korea has been controversial since its inception, and the controversy has been intimately linked to the larger debate over the most effective strategy for dealing with the DPRK. Food aid has been provided to help North Korea alleviate chronic, massive food shortages that began in the early 1990s and that led to severe famine in the mid-1990s that killed an estimated 1-2 million North Koreans. Food aid to North Korea has come under criticism because the DPRK government restricts the ability of donor agencies to operate in the country, particularly with regard to monitoring food shipments, making it difficult to assess how much of each donation actually reaches its intended recipients. There have been anecdotal reports that food aid is diverted to the North Korean elite, who reportedly either consume it themselves or resell it for profit on the black market. There are also reports that international food assistance has been diverted to the North Korean military.
Disastrous floods in the summer of 1995 plunged the country into a severe famine that by some estimates was responsible for one to two million deaths, approximately 5% - 10% of North Korea’s population. Although natural disasters were the immediate causes of the food crisis, the root causes of the famine were decades of economic and agricultural mismanagement. In September 1995, North Korea appealed for international food assistance, contradicting its national ideology of juche, or self-reliance…. Unlike the situation in other humanitarian emergencies, the North Korean government has remained intact and therefore has been able to impose strict limits on international relief groups’ ability to operate in the country, in particular on aid workers’ interaction with the North Korean people.
Aid workers involved in the North Korean relief effort offer a variety of reasons Pyongyang has prohibited access to certain areas, including the presence of sensitive security-related facilities; anger at the actions of a particular local official; and/or the “triaging” of the northern and eastern areas of the country so that more food can be provided to politically favored regions and constituencies, particularly the communist party elite in Pyongyang. A 2002 nutrition survey found, for instance, that acute malnutrition among North Korean children was three times as high in one of the eastern provinces than in Pyongyang.

|